Maritime transport indicators


Map 1. Annual change in liner shipping connectivity, 2023
(Percentage)

Notes: Change year-on-year in the LSCI from Q1 2022 to Q1 2023

a Change of less than 5 per cent, year-on-year.

Liner shipping connectivity throughout the world

In the third quarter of 2023, China was the economy best connected to the global liner shipping network, as measured by the liner shipping connectivity index (LSCI). The Republic of Korea, Singapore, Malaysia and the United States of America followed next in the rankings. Regional leaders included: Spain and the Netherlands in Europe; Panama and Colombia in Latin America and the Caribbean; Egypt and Morocco in Africa; and Sri Lanka and India in Southern Asia. Excluding landlocked countries, among the least connected 30 economies, 17 are SIDS, four of which are also LDCs.

Three of the top five best-connected ports are in China, namely Shanghai, Ningbo and Quindao, together with Pusan in the Republic of Korea and the port of Singapore. The top ten includes eight Southern or South-Eastern Asian ports and two European ports, namely Rotterdam and Antwerp. Amongst the 30 best-connected ports, 20 were in Asia, nine in Europe and one, Tanger Med, in Africa.

Figure 1. Liner shipping connectivity index, top five economies
(China Q1 2006=100)

Port container traffic

Figure 2. World container port throughput
(Millions of twenty-foot equivalent units)
In 2021, 851.1 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) of containers were handled in ports worldwide. World container port throughput increased by 7 percent between 2020 and 2021. This marks the continuation of a long-term trend of steady growth that halted only in the year of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020. Over the last decade, world container port throughput increased by 43 per cent, from 593.8 million TEUs in 2011.1

Asia’s leading role as a global maritime freight loading and discharging centre (see the World seaborne trade page) and its high liner shipping connectivity is mirrored in the region’s high contribution to containerized port throughput. In 2021, ports in developing economies of Asia handled 59 per cent of world port container traffic. The shares of developing America and developing Africa were significantly lower, at 7 and 4 per cent respectively.

Port calls

Globally, 4.6 million port calls were recorded in 2022. The economy that recorded most port calls of ships in 2022 was Norway. The median time of cargo-carrying ships at Norwegian ports was 10 hours.

Figure 3. Containerized port traffic by group of economies, 2021
(Millions of twenty-foot equivalent units)

Concepts and definitions

The liner shipping connectivity index (LSCI) indicates an economy’s position within global liner shipping networks. It is calculated from the number of ship calls, the container handling capacity of ports, the number of services and companies, the size of the largest ship, and the number of countries connected through direct liner shipping services.

The port liner shipping connectivity index is based on the same components as the LSCI but refers to an individual port.

Port container traffic is measured in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs). One TEU represents the volume of a standard 20-feet long intermodal container.

The number of port calls and the time spent in ports are derived from automatic identification systems and port mapping intelligence.

Summary tables

Table 1. Liner shipping connectivity index of most connected economies, by region
(China Q1 2006=100)
    Table 2. Port liner shipping connectivity index of most connected ports, by region
    (China, Hong Kong, Q1 2006 = 100)

    Note: All index values refer to the value at Q1 of the indicated year.

      Table 3. Time at port, by market segment, in the top 20 economies by port call, 2022

      Note: Economies are ranked by number of port calls. Number of port calls includes arrivals of ferries, roll-on roll-off and passenger ships, for which the time in port is not computed. Ships of 1000 gt and above are included.

        Notes

        1. For a discussion of recent developments, see -—
          – ‒
          - –
          —-
          -—
          – ‒
          - –
          —-
          -—
          – ‒
          - –
          —-
          -—
          – ‒
          - –
          —-
          .

        References

          Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
          Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
          Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
          Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
          Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
          Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
          Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
          Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.
          Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
          Donec tincidunt vel mauris a dignissim. Curabitur sodales nunc id vestibulum tempor. Nunc tortor orci, sodales nec eros eget.